CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2025-68461

CVE-2025-68461

In CISA KEV Roundcube

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

Red Hat CSAF/VEX
precedence 100 · revised 2026-06-28
1 not affected
OSV.dev (incl. GHSA)
precedence 80 · revised 2026-09-17
6 affected 6 fixed
CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2026-02-26
2 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (12)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
red_hat_products Red Hat · All currently supported Red Hat products not affected vulnerable code not present no version stated not applicable csaf_redhat
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < 3eacff18d9829c19159f0e30401046d69e5c2a06 vendor fix → 3eacff18d9829c19159f0e30401046d69e5c2a06 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected >= bfbd2da4bdcfc8317cbe357d2adb2edba5496722, < 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 vendor fix → 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < 3cb52d6db1ffd314f8e2a68629be4c9ba859a90b vendor fix → 3cb52d6db1ffd314f8e2a68629be4c9ba859a90b osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected >= 993b888afe29c383bf45c84f17090f4db96367ba, < 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 vendor fix → 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < bfa032631c36b900e7444dfa278340b33cbf7cdb vendor fix → bfa032631c36b900e7444dfa278340b33cbf7cdb osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed 3eacff18d9829c19159f0e30401046d69e5c2a06 vendor fix → 3eacff18d9829c19159f0e30401046d69e5c2a06 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed 3cb52d6db1ffd314f8e2a68629be4c9ba859a90b vendor fix → 3cb52d6db1ffd314f8e2a68629be4c9ba859a90b osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 vendor fix → 08de250fba731b634bed188bbe18d2f6ef3c7571 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed bfa032631c36b900e7444dfa278340b33cbf7cdb vendor fix → bfa032631c36b900e7444dfa278340b33cbf7cdb osv
Roundcube/Webmail Roundcube · Webmail affected < 1.5.12 none available cve_cna
Roundcube/Webmail Roundcube · Webmail affected >= 1.6.0, < 1.6.12 none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.