CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2024-42009

CVE-2024-42009

CVSS 9.3 In CISA KEV Roundcube

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

Red Hat CSAF/VEX
precedence 100 · revised 2026-02-02
1 not affected
OSV.dev (incl. GHSA)
precedence 80 · revised 2026-09-17
6 affected 6 fixed
CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2025-10-21
1 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (11)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
red_hat_products Red Hat · All currently supported Red Hat products not affected vulnerable code not present no version stated not applicable csaf_redhat
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < e03f018347818af7e1f70827fdc1b3cc6f98a88d vendor fix → e03f018347818af7e1f70827fdc1b3cc6f98a88d osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected >= bfbd2da4bdcfc8317cbe357d2adb2edba5496722, < 0b8d59ba70c7f02e1dd74fa4fc2aee61581160f1 vendor fix → 0b8d59ba70c7f02e1dd74fa4fc2aee61581160f1 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 vendor fix → 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected < ed988390312e0ad16843dbd1eb7a1e82241545d2 vendor fix → ed988390312e0ad16843dbd1eb7a1e82241545d2 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail affected >= 993b888afe29c383bf45c84f17090f4db96367ba, < 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 vendor fix → 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed e03f018347818af7e1f70827fdc1b3cc6f98a88d vendor fix → e03f018347818af7e1f70827fdc1b3cc6f98a88d osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed 0b8d59ba70c7f02e1dd74fa4fc2aee61581160f1 vendor fix → 0b8d59ba70c7f02e1dd74fa4fc2aee61581160f1 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed ed988390312e0ad16843dbd1eb7a1e82241545d2 vendor fix → ed988390312e0ad16843dbd1eb7a1e82241545d2 osv
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail fixed 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 vendor fix → 44ed0d6fb0cefe30c9c7892c61c34a21a7213c56 osv
n/a/n/a n/a · n/a affected no version stated vendor label: all versions none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.