⚠ Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV) Tracker

Description

The RocketMQ NameServer component still has a remote command execution vulnerability as the CVE-2023-33246 issue was not completely fixed in version 5.1.1. When NameServer address are leaked on the extranet and lack permission verification, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using the update configuration function on the NameServer component to execute commands as the system users that RocketMQ is running as. It is recommended for users to upgrade their NameServer version to 5.1.2 or above for RocketMQ 5.x or 4.9.7 or above for RocketMQ 4.x to prevent these attacks.

Lifecycle Timeline

• 2023-07-12
  CVE published

  Entered the public CVE record.

  CVE.org →
• 2023-07-14
  Public exploit code 2 days later

  Public GitHub repository Malayke/CVE-2023-37582_EXPLOIT — unvetted, may contain malware

  GitHub PoC →
• 2024-09-18
  First national advisory 14 months later

  FBI — People's Republic of China-Linked Actors Compromise Routers and IoT Devices for Botnet Operations

  CyberzSOC advisory index →
• not recorded
  EPSS flags exploitation risk

  Reached 10% only through a model recalibration, which moves every score at once and says nothing about this CVE.
• not recorded
  Added to CISA KEV

  Not in the CISA KEV catalog.
• not recorded
  Federal remediation due

  No remediation deadline set.
• not recorded
  Vendor fix published

  No dated vendor fix. Only Microsoft publishes a machine-readable release date; other vendors state a fixed version without one.

Each milestone comes from a different source, so gaps between them are gaps in what those sources publish, not evidence that nothing happened. EPSS history for this CVE holds 179 points from 2023-07-15, tracked daily from 2026-09-09; earlier points are weekly, which dates a spike to within a week. Peak probability 94.2% on 2025-10-25.

Published Applicability

Check whether a specific version is affected →

What each source publishes about which product versions carry this vulnerability, kept as written rather than merged. Absence here means no source has published applicability data, not that nothing is affected.

Research & News Coverage

No mentions found in monitored research blogs or news feeds.

Detection & Exploitation

Coverage across public collections only: Nuclei and OpenVAS NVT (scan); Snort and Suricata ET Open (network); Sigma and YARA (host/SIEM); Metasploit, Exploit-DB and public GitHub repositories (exploit). Absence here means nothing public was found, not that detection is impossible.
GitHub PoC repositories are collected automatically by PoC-in-GitHub (CC0) and are not vetted: some are fakes and some are malware. Treat them as evidence that code was published, not as code to run.
OpenVAS coverage derives from the Greenbone Community Feed, made available under the Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0; its individual Vulnerability Tests are licensed GNU GPL v2.

CISA Assessment (Vulnrichment / SSVC)

D3FEND Countermeasures

Defensive techniques inferred by MITRE D3FEND from the underlying weakness (CWE-94) — general hardening and detection guidance for this weakness class, not a vendor patch for this specific CVE.

Listed By

Referenced in Advisories

Weaponization Timeline — Offensive & Testing Tools

No exploit-tool sightings recorded for this CVE.

Evidence tiers are explained on the About page — a merged Metasploit module is far stronger evidence than a distro package mention.

External References

CVE.org record → NVD entry → FortiGuard Labs → Rapid7 AttackerKB →