CVSS base score: 7.8 (High) CISA · v3.1
Score assigned by CISA's Vulnrichment program; the vendor's CVE record did not include one.
Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability
Vendor: Microsoft Product: Office
Microsoft Office contains a memory corruption vulnerability due to failure to properly handle rich text format files in memory. Successful exploitation allows for remote code execution in the context of the current user.
Each milestone comes from a different source, so gaps between them are gaps in what those sources publish, not evidence that nothing happened. EPSS history for this CVE holds 254 points from 2022-02-05, tracked daily from 2026-09-09; earlier points are weekly, which dates a spike to within a week. Peak probability 97.3% on 2026-06-20.
Check whether a specific version is affected →
What each source publishes about which product versions carry this vulnerability, kept as written rather than merged. Absence here means no source has published applicability data, not that nothing is affected.
No mentions found in monitored research blogs or news feeds.
Coverage across public collections only: Nuclei and OpenVAS NVT (scan);
Snort and Suricata ET Open (network); Sigma and YARA (host/SIEM);
Metasploit, Exploit-DB and public GitHub repositories (exploit). Absence
here means nothing public was found, not that detection is impossible.
GitHub PoC repositories are collected automatically by
PoC-in-GitHub (CC0) and are not vetted:
some are fakes and some are malware. Treat them as evidence that code was
published, not as code to run.
OpenVAS coverage derives from the Greenbone Community Feed, made available
under the Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0;
its individual Vulnerability Tests are licensed
GNU GPL v2.
Defensive techniques inferred by MITRE D3FEND from the underlying weakness (CWE-787) — general hardening and detection guidance for this weakness class, not a vendor patch for this specific CVE.
| Source | Date | Record |
|---|---|---|
| CISA KEV | 2021-11-03 | source record → |
| CISA Vulnrichment | 2025-02-10 | source record → |
| Date | Tool | Evidence quality | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-30 | AtomicRedTeam | Indirect — framework reference | Issue: Develop atomic tests for Sigma rules |
Evidence tiers are explained on the About page — a merged Metasploit module is far stronger evidence than a distro package mention.