CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2026-39808

CVE-2026-39808

In CISA KEV Fortinet

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2026-07-17
10 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (10)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
Fortinet/FortiSandbox Fortinet · FortiSandbox affected >= 4.4.0, <= 4.4.8 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 23.4.4374 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 23.4.4350 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 23.3.4329 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 23.1.4245 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 22.2.4151 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 22.2.4134 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 22.1.4113 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 21.4.4072 none available cve_cna
Fortinet/FortiSandbox PaaS Fortinet · FortiSandbox PaaS affected 21.3.4055 none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.