Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.
A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.
Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.
| Product | Status | Versions | Remediation | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| red_hat_products Red Hat · All currently supported Red Hat products | not affected vulnerable code not present | no version stated | not applicable | csaf_redhat | |
| https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework | affected | < 1c94327c9930510984c23cb49abdd4da2376b33e | vendor fix → 1c94327c9930510984c23cb49abdd4da2376b33e | osv | |
| https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework | fixed | 1c94327c9930510984c23cb49abdd4da2376b33e | vendor fix → 1c94327c9930510984c23cb49abdd4da2376b33e | osv | |
| Apache Software Foundation/Apache OFBiz Apache Software Foundation · Apache OFBiz | affected | < 18.12.16 | none available | cve_cna | |
| apache/ofbiz apache · ofbiz | affected | < 18.12.16 | none available | cve_adp |
A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.